On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 17:20:37 -0400, "D. Hugh Redelmeier" <h...@mimosa.com> wrote: > I just noticed that my Fedora 10 X86_64 installation DVD has a fair number > of packages labelled fc9 rather than fc10. In fact some are > fc<earlier>.
This is normal. > Why would the packagers not rebuild all packages for a release? Is > there not a risk that some of these packages would be built against > libraries that have changed? I didn't think that the ABI for fc9 was > supported by fc10. Because it's a lot of work that normally isn't needed. It does happen that all of the packages are being rebuilt for F11. There were a few different reasons to do this, this time around. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
