On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:17:02 -0700 Craig White wrote: > I rarely go to dead tree format these days so no. If the test were with > the exact same document and uninstall AR9 and re-install AR8 and > verifiable, it would be interesting but too many other variables often > sneak in otherwise.
That's what I did. Installed acroread 9, printing slowed way down. Re-installed acroread 8, everything went back to normal. Google found me a few mentions of (apparently) the Windows acroread 9 doing the same thing, so I guess it's a common problem. Meanwhile, acroread 8 will continue to live on that machine. I didn't notice any improvement in acroread 9 that mattered to me, anyway. It's a HP Laserjet 5100 that we use to create plates for a printing press, so it gets used a lot and is fairly critical to the printer's business operations. Having it slow down that much really held up production. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
