Paul wrote:
Have you tried a plain old filesystem, such as ext3 or ext2, without LVM or
anything fancy schmancy?
Not that I am a big fan of Anaconda, far from it, but always go back to the
basics when other things don't work.
The problem is that we have had ext4 since FC9, and regressing the performance
to get around a bug in the installer seems silly. I have another way to get
around it, don't install it until it's fixed.
It's hard to tell if the lack of 32 bit issues is from lack of a problem or
people using virtual machines and full disk installs. But the inability to test
on bare iron is going to be an issue eventually.
- Paul
P.S.: Installs fine so far on everything I have tested it on, be it 5 years
old or still bleeding along the edges.
I'm pulling the 32 bit snapshot now, just to see if this is a 64 bit problem or
generic.
--
Bill Davidsen <david...@tmr.com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
