2009/6/24 Patrick Mansfield <pat...@aracnet.com>: > It happens for me ... when I didn't really want it. But I figured out I > just need to allow samba ports in my general firewall rules, then the > libvirt additions should just work (right now I'm just running "iptables > -I INPUT -i virbr0 -j ACCEPT" after libvirt is running). > > What is iptables showing? > > I see virbr0 in mine and more.
hm, odd. Wonder what is different about my config. I'm just using a very simple firewall setup with only ssh loaded. After the libvirtd service is started, I see no mention of virbr0 in iptables output: # iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere state NEW tcp dpt:ssh REJECT all -- anywhere anywhere reject-with icmp-host-prohibited Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination REJECT all -- anywhere anywhere reject-with icmp-host-prohibited Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination and yet ifconfig shows the virbr0 bridge has been created succesfully. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
