Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 16:29:43 +0800, > Ed Greshko <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >>> >> I think you miss my point.... >> > > No, but the technical explanation was later on in the message. Because at > least some of the fedora lists mung reply-to, I strip them out so that > it doesn't break the reply function (which is only supposed to reply to > the address(es) in the from header). So when I do a reply all, if you > haven't set mail-followup-to to say just reply to the list, two messages > will be sent, one to the list and one directly to your address. And if > you have duplicates off in your mailman configuration, mailman will note > that you appear to be getting a separate copy and not send you a copy > through the list. The copy you get directly from me will not have a reply-to > header added. > Here is one interesting example of your handiwork.... I love the Cc:
From: Bruno Wolff III <[email protected]> To: Frank Cox <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> References: <of18f6c2f1.693f43cd-on8525763a.004995fd-8525763a.004a2...@macys.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -0.877 (AWL) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.12 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.110.10 X-loop: [email protected] Cc: =?us-ascii?Q?=3D=3FISO-8859-1=3FQ=3F_Community=5Fassistance=2C_=5Fenco?= =?us-ascii?B?dXJhZ2VtZW50LCA9MDlhbmRfYWR2aWNlX2Zvcl8/PSA9P0lTTy04ODU5LTE/?= =?us-ascii?B?UT91c2luZ19GZWRvcmEu?= ?= <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Questionable Status In the event you may have questions about my environment you will find it as is in the archives.... https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-September/msg01769.html
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
