Am Mi 12.Dezember 2007 schrieb Sebastian Vahl: > Am Mi 12.Dezember 2007 schrieb Jeremy Katz: > > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:57 +0100, Sebastian Vahl wrote: > > > I'm still unable to don't include firefox on a livecd (although the > > > xulrunner/firefox conflict is resolved). I'm not even having an idea > > > why it is included in my local spins. I've explicitely removed it from > > > livecd-fedora-base-desktop.ks and livecd-fedora-kde.ks (with > > > "-firefox") and it shouldn't be needed by any package (since xulrunner > > > is there). I can easily remove it on a running livecd (or even with > > > "--shell") and rpm is not complaining about dependencies then. > > > > > > firefox is installed right aside xulrunner, so I'm assuming it's maybe > > > related to the provides from firefox (esp. gecko-libs). > > > > Are you explicitly listing xulrunner in your %packages section? If not > > and if there's something depending on an unversioned gecko-libs, then > > firefox could well be getting chosen as the shortest provider of > > gecko-libs > > No I haven't listed xulrunner (only as "-xulrunner") and don't even want > this one (but that's another problem: #420101). > > So the next step is maybe: Figure out what is requirering the unversioned > gecko-libs and file a bug against that package?
Mhh. The only package requireing gecko-libs is yelp. But that one has a versioned require (gecko-libs = 1.9). So this problem may also be fixed as a side-effect when #420101 is resolved. But I'm still wondering why firefox is pulled in? Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Fedora-livecd-list mailing list Fedora-livecd-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list