Sean Godsell wrote: > With the exact same fedora image. I was able to save almost 110 > megabytes. Wow, what a savings.
no doubt. > I don't know why fedora didn't > take the time to use squashfs+lzma, but it is worth it. I hope they put > it in the next release. Most likely because it doesn't appear to be included in the upstream kernel. When/if it is, this is a no-brainer. -- Rex -- Fedora-livecd-list mailing list Fedora-livecd-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
