Am Mittwoch, den 04.03.2009, 22:51 +0200 schrieb مؤيد السعدي: > use system-logs which will be either generic-logos or fedora-logos > > if the icon needed by lxde is not provided by generic-logos, file a bug > report against generic-logos
This will take too much time and it wont help me anyway because of 2. > > 2. Even if I provide a neutral icon ether in system-logos or in my > > package itself, I need to specify the icon with it's full path. > in both cases the needed icon should be provided by both generic-logos or > fedora-logos > > let's say "generic-logos" should provide a desktop independent icon for > main menu in less famous desktops And how would this help me? Let's say we include icon-panel-menu.png also in generic-logos, what do we gain? I still need an absolute path like in /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/24x24/apps/icon-panel-menu.png. If I don't specify the full path it is not predictable which size the panel chooses. > XFCE had a similar problem at some point when F10 was in rawhide > later they provide the icon, Yes, and it nearly took a wohle release until they finally shipped the icon in system-logos. :( > another approach is file a bug report against lxde I'm the LXDE maintainer as well as member of LXDE upstream, so I can (nearly) change anything you suggest, but I still don't see how an icon in generic-logos solves my problem. Regards, Christoph -- Fedora-livecd-list mailing list Fedora-livecd-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list