On 6/20/07, Greg Dekoenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:

> But remember this: one of the the biggest reasons for opening ALL of the
> production tools for F7 was to make it *as easy as possible* for people
who
> disagree with the "official" policy to build their own versions of
Fedora.
>
> What does this mean?  It means that you, Rodrigo, can build your own
version
> of Fedora that *does not* include the pieces to which you object. And if
you
> submit this version for board approval as an "official" Fedora release,
I'm
> pretty sure you'd get it.
>
> But you have to do the work of maintaining it... and you have to deal
with
> the complaints when other people don't agree with *your* policies.  :)

In fact... and sorry to expand on my own point...

This is, in fact, an *extremely important freedom* that we're talking
about here.  I've been in the Fedora leadership for a long time now, and
we've made decisions that even *I* disagree with.

For what it's worth, I will *encourage* people to make their own versions
of Fedora that adhere to *their* standards of what Fedora should and
shouldn't be.  And we let the Marketplace of Users decide.


I am thinking about this. Create one Brazilian spin !

Thanks to all for the attention!

Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira
www.projetofedora.org
-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Reply via email to