Hi Jon,

Great to hear from you. This is an excellent email, and I thank you for writing it.

A few thoughts, inline:

As things stand, it seems to me that the main activities related to marketing Fedora are:

* FPL's release interviews
* Ambassadors events
* Documenting media coverage on the mailing list
* Occassional developer interviews
* Occassional blog posts & articles pimping features/community
* Responding to and correcting articles that are inaccurate Re: Fedora

Of these, the marketing team, as a *team* are responsible for 3 (although this is largely done by Rahul) and now 6. Red Hat PR are responsible for 1 and for the most part 5.

Correct me if I'm wrong here.

Documenting media coverage is important, and is done well on this list. In 2009, I see that as an activity that should be continued in the same way that it currently is, more or less.

I'd like to see the interview continue, as this is a big part of the "Folks/Friends" messaging point.

====

In terms of Ambassador events, I would categorize the marketing team's function as one of "information preparation". The Fedora 10 talking points page was an excellent example of this.

I think the Fedora Marketing team should work with the Fedora Project Leader to produce a quarterly "talking points" page that gives Ambassadors (or anyone speaking in public about Fedora) several pieces of information:

(1) Details about the current stable release.

(2) Interesting information about the direction of the current development release (Rawhide).

(3) Talking points regarding the larger Fedora Project, as opposed to simply the Fedora distro. Areas we are focusing on, goals, etc.

A quarterly page will allow the message to be refined a few times each year, but stable enough for Ambassadors to familiarize themselves with it.

 * We should create a *time based* marketing plan that ensures we
have things to be doing, promoting, throughout the release cycle

Yes. The tasks of the Marketing Team are cyclical, and vary in priority depending on where we are in a release cycle. As a release approaches, "features and first" are more important than "folks" for example.

* We need to work closer with Red Hat PR.
 * Not sure how this can work better, but a lot of stuff seems to
happen that no one outside RH ever realises. (Correct me if I'm wrong)
 * Have no idea if RH PR take advantage of work that the community
does, is our work just going to waste?

Paul Frields continues to be the best conduit to Red Hat PR that we have for Fedora. Members of the Community Architecture team can also help with this (Max, Greg, Karsten, Jack). One of Jack's formal job responsibilities is to provide leadership to the Fedora Marketing team, so I'd encourage everyone to work with Jack and Paul on issues that sit at the intersection between Fedora Marketing and Red Hat PR.

* We should record media coverage of Fedora on the wiki instead of
just on the mailing list. Make a good historical archive and provide
us with the opportunity to better track how Fedora is perceived
outside of our own community across releases.

+1

================

Conclusion:

Jon's email (and my response) have presented several interesting tasks for 2009 in Fedora Marketing land:

(1) time-based marketing plan and schedule

(2) quarterly talking points

(3) fedora magazine

(4) meetings w/ more strategic focus

(5) key messaging points and themes

I'm going to ask Jack to begin the 2009 meetings with these five areas as the focal points, and also to take inventory of any remaining action items from 2008 that are still open and/or need to be carried over.

I am also going to commit myself to better attendance at the Fedora Marketing meetings.

--Max

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Reply via email to