Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189952 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 00:11 EST ------- Issues: The manpage is executable for some reason. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named and is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible and included in the package. * source files match upstream: b0fcb1ad62708478478218190c355fd0 metapixel-1.0.1.tar.gz b0fcb1ad62708478478218190c355fd0 metapixel-1.0.1.tar.gz-srpm * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, i386 and x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns no (non %doc) directories. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. X file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O No test suite, so no %check. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
