Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-19 12:46 EST ------- First off, there are three empty PNG files in the documentation: E: lilypond-doc zero-length /usr/share/doc/lilypond-doc-2.8.2/input/mutopia/J.S.Bach/wtk1-fugue2.png E: lilypond-doc zero-length /usr/share/doc/lilypond-doc-2.8.2/input/mutopia/W.A.Mozart/mozart-hrn-3.png E: lilypond-doc zero-length /usr/share/doc/lilypond-doc-2.8.2/input/mutopia/E.Satie/petite-ouverture-a-danser.png Any idea about these? They come that way from upstream. I guess there's not much point in including them if they're empty. Other than that I have no issues. I do understand your point about the size of the documentation. Technically you could build it as a completely separate package because you're using a different upstream tarball, but once GS 8.50 is in you'll be able to build it directly and you'd be back to the same problem. Or you could just stick with using the upstream tarball. The packages with separate -doc packages not built from the main RPM all seem to be shipping preformatted documentation from upstream. I'm going to approve this package and leave it to you to fix the three empty files when you check in. Or if you like, you can strip the documentation from the base package and submit a separate package, which I promise to review quickly. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
