Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ganymed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191014 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-11 00:52 EST ------- Some observations: There is absolutely no prohibition against using macros in your Source URLs; you can use it if you like. Folks who want to fetch the upstream source given your specfile should use spectool -g. The package builds fine in mock (x86_64, development). rpmlint has a few complaints. There are several description-line-too-long warnings; you should reflow your %description to keep things down under 80 characters. W: ganymed incoherent-version-in-changelog 209.2 209-2.fc6 Standard format is to separate version from release by a hyphen. W: ganymed no-documentation The source zip (zipball?) seems to have plenty of documentation. Is there some reason it's not packaged? The -debuginfo package generation seems to be confused; the build log is filled with this: extracting debug info from /var/tmp/ganymed-209-2.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/gcj/ganymed/ganymed-209.jar.so cpio: ganymed-ssh2-build209/ch/ethz/ssh2/Connection$1$TimeoutState.java: No such file or directory cpio: ganymed-ssh2-build209/ch/ethz/ssh2/Connection$1.java: No such file or directory cpio: ganymed-ssh2-build209/ch/ethz/ssh2/Connection.java: No such file or directory repeated once for each file in the "src" directory of the source zipball. All that ends up in the -debuginfo package are the symbols from the single .so. I'm not really sure what's supposed to happen here. It seems like it's looking in the wrong place; either that or something has deleted those files from the buildroot before find-debuginfo.sh is run. Other than those, I'd be happy approving this package. I just want to make sure I'm on the right track and that I have enough basic understanding of how Java packaging is supposed to work first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review