Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: javasvn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191015 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-26 13:21 EST ------- Note that 1.0.6 is out, and I can no longer fetch 1.0.4 from upstream. I looked at the license and it seems acceptable to me, but it also doesn't correspond to anything rpnlint already knows about. I suggest just leaving things as-is and ignoring the rpmlint complaint. I also suggest ignoring the non-standard-group warning on the javadoc subpackage. W: javasvn invalid-license TMate License W: javasvn-debuginfo invalid-license TMate License W: javasvn-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation W: javasvn-javadoc invalid-license TMate License Other than that it does build fine in mock (with ganymed-ssh2 in a local repo) and looks OK. If you update to 1.0.6 I'll do a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
