Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-29 03:02 EST ------- to save some time and maybe some help :) rpmlint output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/mjk/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ntop-3.2-2.i386.rpm W: ntop conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ntop/etter.finger.os.gz W: ntop conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ntop/ntop-cert.pem W: ntop conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ntop/oui.txt.gz W: ntop conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ntop/p2c.opt.table.gz W: ntop conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ntop/specialMAC.txt.gz W: ntop conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/ntop W: ntop wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/ntop-3.2/RedHat-rpmbuild-HOWTO.txt E: ntop non-standard-uid /var/ntop ntop E: ntop non-standard-gid /var/ntop nobody E: ntop non-standard-dir-perm /var/ntop 0775 W: ntop devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libntop.so W: ntop devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libmyrrd.so E: ntop non-readable /etc/ntop.conf 0600 E: ntop script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/ntop-3.2/ntop-autotools.pdf W: ntop devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libntopreport.so E: ntop script-without-shellbang /usr/share/ntop/html/privacyNotice.html E: ntop executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/ntop E: ntop script-without-shellbang /usr/share/ntop/html/ntopdump.dtd E: ntop wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/ntop/html/ntopdump.dtd E: ntop executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/ntop/specialMAC.txt.gz E: ntop executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/ntop/oui.txt.gz W: ntop dangerous-command-in-%postun userdel E: ntop incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ntop \$prog I wasn't sure if the *.so files should be split into a devel package or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review