Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197827 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-10 15:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Couldn't we get around the abiquity by just using perl(Net::SLeay) ? Yes, things depending on the Net::SSLeay module should have a dependency on perl(Net::SSLeay). At the time I did the rename there were some packages using name based dependencies to this so the Provides could not be just dropped. > those files should probably be chmodded in CVS. Shouldn't be needed. Unless something has changed recently, the only thing CVS remembers is whether files have executable bits or not, and permissions like 0666 don't propagate anywhere. Files are usually 0555 or 0444 inside the repo, and on checkout/export they retain the executable status while other bits are set according to the checkouter's umask. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
