Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: freeglut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200172 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-25 23:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 4. Optional. Be careful about the Obsoletes/Provides. It seemingly > Obsoletes > itself using: > Obsoletes: glut <= 3.7 > Provides: glut = 3.7 > maybe use something safer like: > Obsoletes: glut < 3.7-%{release} > Provides: glut = 3.7-%{release} > (and likewise for the Ob/Pr for glut-devel) > Or heck, drop the glut Obsoletes/Provides bits altogether, isn't glut pretty > much ancient history anyway? (: Nope, glut isn't ancient history. freeglut is an alternative to/replacement for glut. Therefore packages using GLut often Requires: glut-devel, because they depend on a package providing a Glut API and do not depend on freeglut/freeglut-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
