Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-29 12:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #42) > I'll forward the request for inclusion of this kernel-module to FESCo for > approval, but I will do my best to prevent that this module get's into Extras > as > long as the plans says "we don't want to get the driver merged upstream" Which you realize would mean that we can't get a fully functioning asterisk (for people with zaptel hardware, which includes me) in Extras until somebody forks the kernel module development. I agree that Digium's development model leaves a bit to be desired (who needs to change the license of the kernel module anyway, and is that even legal?), but the fact is that zaptel is GPL, so is this really the right place to draw the proverbial line in the sand? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
