Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-15 16:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Seems to be some 64-bit problems: > > RPM build errors: > File not found by glob: > /var/tmp/codeblocks-1.0-0.2.20060812svn2840.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/*.so.* > File not found: > /var/tmp/codeblocks-1.0-0.2.20060812svn2840.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/codeblocks/plugins > File not found: > /var/tmp/codeblocks-1.0-0.2.20060812svn2840.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/codeblocks/plugins/libastyle.so > (and so on for many files). > > Looks like the upstream source wants to install into /usr/lib regardless of > what > configure is told. > Should be a libtool issue I think as the Makefile.am files are very clean and all are used on the build system to create the "executable" files. Can you check how is defined libdir in Makefile.in and Makefile in some src/plugins/ subdir? I have libdir = @libdir@/@PACKAGE@/plugins in Makefile.in and libdir = ${exec_prefix}/lib/codeblocks/plugins in Makefile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
