Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980


Tom "spot" Callaway <tcall...@redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tcall...@redhat.com




--- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcall...@redhat.com>  2009-01-12 
17:39:43 EDT ---
So, just to be clear... this is content that is only useful with proprietary
applications, right?

There is no relevant guideline to match this. Our emulator policy is the
inverse (you can include the FOSS emulator, if there are FOSS ROMS). I think
this needs to go to FESCo for review
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content):

"All content is subject to review by FESCo, who has the final say on whether or
not it can be included."

I'll put this on FESCo's radar. For what it is worth, I support including this
FOSS licensed content, as it "enhances the OS user experience" has "an open
source compatible license", and is not "legally questionable", the main three
barriers for content inclusion.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to