Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478506 Ian Weller <ianwel...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Ian Weller <ianwel...@gmail.com> 2009-02-15 15:26:51 EDT --- == FULL REVIEW == [ OK ] specfiles match: fcb61fc7a2957865ab2b3e0f135eb732 trac-customfieldadmin-plugin.spec fcb61fc7a2957865ab2b3e0f135eb732 trac-customfieldadmin-plugin.spec.1 [FAILED] source files match upstream: I can't tell. The instructions included in the specfile to generate the tarball don't work. svn: '/svn/!svn/bc/5267/customfieldsadminplugin/0.10' path not found [ OK ] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [ OK ] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently. [ OK ] dist tag is present. [ OK ] build root is correct. [ OK ] license field matches the actual license. [ OK ] license is open source-compatible. [ OK ] license text included in package. [ OK ] latest version is being packaged. [ OK ] BuildRequires are proper. [ N/A ] compiler flags are appropriate. [ OK ] %clean is present. [ OK ] package builds in mock. [ OK ] package installs properly. [ ] debuginfo package looks complete. [ OK ] rpmlint is silent. It did return: trac-customfieldadmin-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation trac-customfieldadmin-plugin.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/customfieldadmin/htdocs/js/CustomFieldAdminPage_actions.js but seeing how it didn't come with documentation and that Javascript files don't have shebangs, I'd ignore it. [ OK ] final provides and requires are sane [ N/A ] %check is present and all tests pass: [ N/A ] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [ OK ] owns the directories it creates. [ OK ] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [ OK ] no duplicates in %files. [ OK ] file permissions are appropriate. [ N/A ] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page. [ OK ] code, not content. [ OK ] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [ OK ] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [ OK ] no headers. [ OK ] no pkgconfig files. [ OK ] no libtool .la droppings. [ OK ] desktop files valid and installed properly. ------------------------------------------------------- I approve this package (trac-customfieldadmin-plugin) ------------------------------------------------------- (just be sure to check on the SVN instructions) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review