Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224245 Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org |ti...@math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu> 2009-02-21 14:14:44 EDT --- This package looks quite a bit better now. Regarding the stuff in the demo directory, I think any of those possibilities would work, although a subpackage is probably overkill. Regarding the patches, it would be nice to document them somehow (at least adding comments to the spec referring to the above bugzilla tickets) but I'm not really sure it's within the scope of this review to insist that those remaining three patches be reconciled with upstream. It would certainly be a good idea to work with upstream to somehow make them unnecessary, and of course Fedora is steadfastly against letting more of this kind of thing creep in (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment, and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WhyUpstream) but I recognize that there is some historical cruft that may not be simple to get rid of. So really I'd say that if those patches were documented in the spec with links to the above bugzilla tickets, and something is done with the demo directory then I would consider the package OK. I would still urge further work with upstream and perhaps the previous maintainers of this package to understand the patches and either get them sent upstream or dropped from the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review