Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #9 from Lucian Langa <co...@gnome.eu.org> 2009-02-23 15:17:14 EDT --- Please bump & post your spec and srpm for each modification you make. It is easier to track. (In reply to comment #7) > As for upstream, they do not want to change how they do the sonames as they > claim that Debian requires it the way they do it. Shared libraries should have a proper versioned soname. I really doubt Debian forbids that. http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Program-Library-HOWTO/shared-libraries.html You can make one but problems will appear in case upstream decides on a different scheme later on. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#no-soname Starting with .0 for major is the best way. I still think you should insist on proper soname upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
