Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 --- Comment #24 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gco...@redhat.com> 2009-03-04 14:44:29 EDT --- Kevin, We requested this package because it included pre-built binaries, and to comply with Fedora policies, we'd have to build it twice. With koji recently added features, we can actually build bochs-bios from within bochs package as a noarch subpackage(done a scratch build of it today). So given this, what is the preferred path? Get rid of the newly created rpm and use a bochs-bios package created from bochs? Or keep it, and have bochs to depend on it? Appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
