Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 --- Comment #33 from _pjp_ <pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in> 2009-03-09 02:07:16 EDT --- Hello Rick, First of all thanks a million for your comments, I deeply appreciate it. (In reply to comment #27) > 1. Did I miss a trick during software build, or does Prasad's tarball > Makefile so far build/install only dnscache, and not the six other > binaries? (I've not looked closely; I just did ./configure; make; make > install.) Well no, you didn't miss any steps. It's just that, so far I've only been able to change dnscacahe. Though the work is in good progress for others, and soon I'll include them as well. > 2. From a very quick glance, I think Prasad has not yet applied quite a > number of patches often recommended to fix djbdns and bring it up to > current standards -- some of those fixing significant security issues. I have > a list at > http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Network_Other/dns-servers.html#djbdns-patches , > and link to Jonathan de Boyne Pollard's and tinydns.org's separate pages. Thanks Rick! That's the kind of inputs I'm looking for. I'll see to it that all those patches are applied, with due credits to the original authors. Thanks so much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
