Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489614 Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu> 2009-03-12 15:44:26 EDT --- Please note that the License: tag should indicate the license of the final, built package. You have: # admin.h - MIT # ppport.h - GPL+ or Artisic (same as any version of Perl) # everything else: BSD (two clause) License: MIT and BSD and ( GPL+ or Artistic ) yet admin.h and pport.h are not in the final package; they are merely compiled with the rest of the code. Honestly I don't know "GPL+ or Artistic" combines with both MIT and BSD code when all of it is compiled together. My guess is that GPL+ dominates, but I don't know what happens to Artistic. Blocking FE-Legal for an opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
