Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461050 --- Comment #9 from Lucian Langa <co...@gnome.eu.org> 2009-03-13 05:43:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > I believe the license of this program is GPLv2 (only); most of the source > files > just say "version 2" with no "or later" clause. > I note that a newer version is out. I don't think it will significantly > effect > the packaging, but you can update if you like and I'll look it over. Updated to 2.25. > Note that the touch call in your recode function is backwards, so you don't > actually preserve the date. It's not a big deal, but since you went to the > effort.... Fixed. > I wonder about the files in /usr/share/tucnak2. If they're not actually used > by the problem, would they be better off packaged as documentation? (Not that > 100K of files really matter much, but I guess it's worth asking.) Well actually some of the files from that directory are used, the README file in that directory is outdated. I am also trying to send a patch upstream that enables lookup files from that directory as a fallback. > The desktop file has an error: > key "Categories" is a list and does not have a semicolon as trailing > character, fixing Fixed. > I installed and ran this and it seemed to work, but I can get it to segfault > repeatably by bringing up a map. Honestly I have no clue at all how to use > the > software so I was just blindly poking keys. That might be sufficiently > crippling that it should be fixed before importing, but I don't really know. it shouldn't happen and it seems I cannot reproduce this. there is an initial configuration dialog that asks among other things for callsign and WWL (world wide locator). It is possible that this field is not correctly validated. I wonder if this happens after update, could you send me the generated file ~/tucnac/tucnakrc? new version: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/tucnak2.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/tucnak2-2.25-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review