Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489803 --- Comment #12 from Alex Orlandi <nyr...@gmail.com> 2009-03-20 18:20:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Well, we really don't want to patch in licensing info. Yes, of course. > Did upstream say when they might do a new releas A new release of 0.6.0 is planned within April '09 (for now just 0.6.0_RC1 is available) > Or perhaps you could use a snapshot if they have made changes in their > version control system already? I checkout the svn repository but, as far as license statements is concerned, neither tags neither trunk have relevant differences: the only two files containing license statements are just SerailPort.cpp and SerialPort.h. I can try to ask upstream to add a license header to all the source files in the new release of the library 0.6.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
