Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465858 Alex deVries <alexthepuf...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexthepuf...@gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Alex deVries <alexthepuf...@gmail.com> 2009-03-23 11:01:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > While using this myself for some time I've found experience with this tool > quite painful -- feels very "Alpha" and even experienced a couple of > server-triggered crashes, which may be exploitable. > > Unless I'm only person using this I'm willing to work on this and improve it, > otherwise I won't let it enter Fedora and will close this in some time. > > So please review this only if you're interested in using it :) I'm the author of afpfs-ng, and there definitely are stability problems with it. I am currently working on these bugs (mostly related to making it thread safe). That said, please report your afpfs-ng bugs so I can ensure that they are fixed. I'll leave it up to you to decide if you want to include it in FC10, but everyone will be happier with an upcoming release of afpfs-ng. - Alex -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
