Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492398 Michael Schwendt <bugs.mich...@gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bugs.mich...@gmx.net AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org |bugs.mich...@gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.mich...@gmx.net> 2009-03-28 06:09:46 EDT --- > $ pkg-config --libs slv2 > -lrdf -lrasqal -lraptor -lslv2 > $ pkg-config --libs redland > -lrdf -lrasqal -lraptor The slv2.pc file is optimised for static linking in that it adds the @REDLAND_LIBS@ libs which the shared libslv2 is linked with already. Can be fixed in both packages. > export CFLAGS="%{optflags}" > export CPPFLAGS="%{optflags}" CPPFLAGS duplicates the CFLAGS during compilation. You want to define CXXFLAGS instead, although this project is in plain C. > slv2_plugininstance.h_r1948.diff Does any slv2 header actually require definitions found within <stdlib.h>? Or is it just the plugins that ought to include stdlib.h instead? The comment in the spec doesn't explain this. * Main slv2 package contains API html documentation, which belongs into the -devel package. EasyFix. * Do we have any dependencies for SLV2 already to test with? [Audacity has dropped SLV2/Redland usage prior to releasing 1.3.7-beta] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
