Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490462 gerbier <eric.gerb...@free.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric.gerb...@free.fr --- Comment #23 from gerbier <eric.gerb...@free.fr> 2009-03-30 08:14:16 EDT --- I will answer as rpmorphan developper : - for the "orphan" terminology, I began to work on this project when no other tools exists for rpm packages. The idea comes from debian tools : deborphan, so I adopt the debian terminology. Please note that the spec description already tries to give a definition :"It determines which packages have no other packages depending on their installation" - for the perl-tk dependency : rpmorphan can work without Tk, this is not a "required" dependency, just optional. Another Gui is provided, based on ncurses (perl module Curses::UI), so if Tk is added, you should add Curses too. - for the licence info : it is already included in all perl scripts. In which files should I add it ? I will merge my own spec file with the fedora ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
