Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #13 from Jan ONDREJ <ondr...@salstar.sk> 2009-04-02 02:33:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Sorry for taking so long; No problem. We have time. I also forgot that I have an open review. :) > However, it's kind of weird to patch up to a CVS snapshot by including a patch > thats larger than the source tarball. It's OK to pick patches out of the > upstream SCM if that's what you want, but if you want to ship a snapshot, it's > better to simply do a checkout and include that as your tarball. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL for information on how we do > this. Basically, you make the tarball but include instructions for generating > it so that someone else who comes along will know where it came from. > Currently you just have this big patch with no information on duplicating it. > OK, repackaged as source and also sent an email to upstream mailinglist, which is asking to release this as stable (or at least official snapshot). New package can be found here: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/libirman.spec http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/10/libirman-0.4.4-5.20090314cvs.fc10.src.rpm It was also possible to strip patch by removing "configure" part, which is autoregenerated later from spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
