Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.leht...@iki.fi> 2009-04-08 08:14:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > Currently there's no license included and two header files > > specify the GPLv2+ license instead of BSD. > > This asks for a licence clarification from upstream. Yes, that's in the bug report I sent upstream. > > > # Move include files to %{_includedir} instead > > mv %{buildroot}/%{_includedir}/%{name}/* %{buildroot}/%{_includedir} > > rmdir %{buildroot}/%{_includedir}/%{name} > > Better ask upstream for confirmation and a fix in the tarball. The headers > need > this change for 'include "xdrfile.h"' to work, but it changes the API because > users of this library can no longer "#include <xdrfile/xdrfile.h>". True. I suggested moving the headers in the same bug report. Now one just has to wait until upstream reacts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
