Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494647 Jerry James <loganje...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |loganje...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org |loganje...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jerry James <loganje...@gmail.com> 2009-04-08 13:09:57 EDT --- I have a couple of questions about the spec file: 1) Is there some reason to avoid the %configure macro in the spec file? (And "s/Not/Note" in the comment above the configure invocation if so.) 2) Shouldn't this package "Requires: emacs(bin)"? You noted a problem with "make mmm.pdf". The problem is that the texinfo.tex in the mmm-mode distribution is being used, and it is too old (it's from 1999!). Just rm it, and then the system texinfo.tex gets used, and you get a good build. Some of the Emacs Lisp warnings have me concerned, especially the notes that regexp-opt is being called with 3 arguments but only accepts 1 or 2. This is almost certain to lead to broken compiled code. I'll make a patch for you. Hang on.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
