Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236





--- Comment #7 from arthurguru <arthurg.w...@gmail.com>  2009-04-16 21:46:53 
EDT ---
Once again thanks for the very accurate feedback Jan.

Your analysis is very good. I have an intermediate process to build fedora
source from the original source and then build the SRPM from that, but as this
is causing another layer of concern I have logged a bug against my own code to
get rid of that process.

To fix this properly I need to do another formal release which involves more
than just Fedora, so in the meantime I have branched the source code for this
Fedora project and all changes provided will now come from this branch and in
the end will be merged into the next release of xmlfy which is some weeks away.

Now the upstream source specified in Source0 (from the branch) IS exactly the
same file used in the SRPM.

Once again I’ve updated the files with the same names as to not break the links
in the original post.

Tested ok, rpmlint is still content.
Also note the new URL location of Source0: in the spec file.


Kind Regards,
Arthur Gouros.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to