Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-02 13:14 EST ------- More on rpmlint output... ========= eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.i386.rpm W: eclipse-gef non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development Environments (IDE) The other IDEs in Fedora Extras use "Development/Tools". On the other hand, eclipse-gef isn't really an IDE or a tool, it's just a library that can also be used for RCP apps and not just within Eclipse. I recommend changing this to "System Environment/Libraries", since that's all this really is. W: eclipse-gef invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) <http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html> Please just change this to "Eclipse Public License". We don't put URLs here. W: eclipse-gef no-documentation The packaging rules say... "If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc." I realize that Eclipse & friends install license somewhere else by default, but we should really put a copy in this directory as well as per the packaging guidelines. Eventually this should be done for all Eclipse packages. I think maybe only one or two do this today. ========= eclipse-gef-examples-3.2.0-2.i386.rpm W: eclipse-gef-examples non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development Environments (IDE) W: eclipse-gef-examples invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) <http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html> As above. ========= eclipse-gef-sdk-3.2.0-2.i386.rpm W: eclipse-gef-sdk non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development Environments (IDE) I think this should be "Documentation". W: eclipse-gef-sdk invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) <http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html> As above. W: eclipse-gef-sdk no-documentation I think this is ignoreable. ========= eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm W: eclipse-gef non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development Environments (IDE) W: eclipse-gef invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) <http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html> As above. W: eclipse-gef mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Just run emacs untabify on the spec file before building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
