Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #51 from Igor Jurišković <juriskovic.i...@gmail.com> 2009-04-29 15:41:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #49) > checking everything again: > > 1. mumble-plugins also needs to Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > (just > checked it) Fixed > 2. i am curious if the menu entry for mumble-overlay makes sense really > because > it doesent start that way (one needs to start a binary with it.). your > decision! ;) It was always senseless to me but Simon told me in earlier replies that it should be installed. I tought "well he is already a packager, he nows better than me". Thats the reason why I was installing it. Its removed now. > 3. gtk-update-icon-cache -q %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor >& /dev/null ||: is > probably a typo -> &> /dev/null ||: > fixing that lets it install nearly cleanly Fixed. > 4. i still get the warnings from ldconfig that /usr/lib64/libmumble.so.1 is > not > a symbolic link (infact it is a hardlink) > id suggest to remove the 2>/dev/null from /sbin/ldconfig calls because that > just hides issues (and not even that correctly in this case) > going to investigate the issue deeper and let you know if i figure out how to > fix that correctly. I think the solution for this is mine bad packaging. It looks like that libmumble.so.x.y.z is part of mumble-overlay package. Thats why it reports it is hardlink. Im waiting for Thorvalds reply to confirm this. > > i hope that you see now that it would be quite impossible to find all issues > in > one run because you picked a really complex package there. Complex guy needs a complex package. :) Anyway, I'm jobless so I have really a lot of spare time. When Thorvald answers my previous post about libraries I'll upload a new spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
