Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497805 Christian Krause <c...@plauener.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Christian Krause <c...@plauener.de> 2009-04-29 17:48:11 EDT --- * rpmlint: OK rpmlint SPECS/cppcheck.spec RPMS/i386/cppcheck-* SRPMS/cppcheck-1.31-1.fc10.src.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * naming: OK - name matches upstream - spec file name %{name}.spec * License: OK - GPLv3+ acceptable for Fedora - license matches the actual license in the source files - license file packaged * spec file in English and legible: OK * sources matches upstream: OK - spectool -g cppcheck.spec works - md5sum: db500cee39ceaa7379bb105046d36cce cppcheck-1.31.tar.bz2 * package compiles: OK - rpm's %{optflags} are used correctly - mock build successful - koji builds for F10, F11 and F12 successful for all architectures: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329473 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329468 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1329463 * build requirements: OK - the BR: gcc-c++ is not necessarily needed, since gcc-c++ is already in the minimum build environment: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 - however, it is not forbidden to add it anyway * locales handling: OK (n/a) * handling of static/shared objects, pkgconfig, header files, etc: OK (n/a) * owns all directories it creates: OK * no files listed twice in %files: OK * permissions on files: OK - %defattr used - actual permissions in binary rpm OK * clean section: OK - rm -rf %{buildroot} used * macro usage: OK * code vs. content: OK - only code and test c++ files * large documentation in subpackage: OK (n/a) - the test files are only 300K * no *.la files: OK * GUI application needs *.desktop file: OK (n/a) * package must not own files/dirs owned by other packages: OK * rm -rf %{buildroot} at beginning of %install: OK * filenames UTF-8: OK * functional test: OK - used some of the code snippets from the test files to verify the functionality of cppcheck * debuginfo: OK - debuginfo package not empty - debuginfo actually usable No problems found => APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
