Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #79 from Peter Lemenkov <lemen...@gmail.com> 2009-05-02 07:08:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #78) > Please check : > > http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird.spec > http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-5.fc10.src.rpm I did - simple removal of directory from one sub-package isn't acceptable. I propose you to create another one sub-package - firebird-filesystem, which will contain all (or almost all) firebird directories and nothing else. All other sub-packages should require this one. Here is a list of all owned directories, listed in spec. $ grep ^%dir firebird.spec | sed s/" %attr(.*)"//g|sort %dir %{fbroot} %dir %{fbroot}/bin-classic %dir %{fbroot}/bin-superserver %dir %{fbroot}/include %dir %{fbroot}/intl %dir %{fbroot}/lib %dir %{fbroot}/UDF-classic %dir %{fbroot}/UDF-superserver %dir %{_localstatedir}/lib/%{name} %dir %{_localstatedir}/lib/%{name}/data %dir %{_localstatedir}/log/%{name} %dir %{_sysconfdir}/%{name} %dir %{_var}/run/%{name} $ However we should not set all directories ownership to this sub-package. I think that we may limit directory ownership of filesystem-subpackage by %{fbroot} (since every sub-package depends on it) and %{fbroot}/lib (since it doesn't harm anyone). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review