Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498920 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl <cw...@alumni.drew.edu> 2009-05-04 11:07:11 EDT --- Looks good. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1335265 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): dcf4bb122b04a26b1106fa1e66adcde76a9c7790 HTML-Toc-1.11.tar.gz dcf4bb122b04a26b1106fa1e66adcde76a9c7790 HTML-Toc-1.11.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc12.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(HTML::Toc) = 1.11 perl-HTML-Toc = 1.11-1.fc12 perl(HTML::TocGenerator) = 1.11 perl(HTML::TocInsertor) = 1.11 perl(HTML::TocUpdator) = 1.11 ====> requires for perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(constant) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(HTML::Parser) perl(HTML::TocGenerator) perl(HTML::TocInsertor) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(strict) perl(vars) =====> perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc12.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc12.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc12.src.rpm perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(HTML::Parser) perl(Test::Differences) perl(Test::More) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
