Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490354 Jochen Schmitt <joc...@herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |joc...@herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt <joc...@herr-schmitt.de> 2009-05-17 15:33:36 EDT --- Good: + Package name matches naming guildlines + Buildroot will be cleaned at the beginning of %clean and %install * Specification of the Buildroot is ok. Bad: - Basename of the SPEC file doesn't machtes package name - URL doesn't shows on proper project homepage - Source doesn't contains full qualified URL - Please change BuildArchitecures into BuildArch: - Source are not in separe el subpackage (/Packaging/Emacs#Packaging_of_source_elisp_files) - Specification of the installation destination on fullfill Emace Packaging guulldline (/Packaging/Emacs#GNU_Emacs) - Package doesn't contains correct Changelog you have to specified version-release on it Your package seems to need a lot of love. I want to suggest that you should read the packaging guildlines and the guildlines for emacs packages carefully. If you can demonstrate in your next approach, that you have understand this guildlines, I may be willing to sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
