Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #40 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti <pro...@gmail.com> 2009-05-24 17:09:17 EDT --- > > I assume, that you ask why I create the symlinks in `/.blender/scripts? No. I know that. > > the answer is, that blender only recorgnise the script and plugins which are > available on this place. This part is just fine. The problem, as I understand, are the shared libraries x python scripts: /usr/lib64/libyafarayplugin.so /usr/lib64/libyafarayqt.so /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/_yafqt.so /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/_yafrayinterface.so /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_light.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_material.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_object.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_texture.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafaray_ui.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafqt.py The shared libraries are architecture dependent, but the scripts are not (but they reference the libraries). Therefore, they can be in the same directory (as they were in previous versions), or in separate directories as they are now. The package seems to be working just fine the way it is now, and I am going to make them available soon in Yafaray forum, so people can test them. If there is a Fedora guideline for this situation, please let me know. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
