Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502686 --- Comment #2 from Denis Arnaud <denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org> 2009-05-31 12:20:37 EDT --- When building on (a kqemu virtual machine set-up with an installation from scratch of) CentOS 5.3, the RPM packages are well built. However, rpmlint still complains on CentOS 5.3 (that "libraries are delivered in a "noarch" package), due the "BuildArch: noarch" directive of the "doc" sub-package, though that directive is enclosed within proper "%if 0%{fedora} >= 10 [...] %endif" clause, as per the following: ------------------------- %package doc Summary: HTML documentation for the %{name} library Group: Documentation %if 0%{?fedora} >= 10 BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: texlive-latex %endif ------------------------- I have checked that 'rpm --eval "%{fedora}"' gives "%{fedora}" under CentOS 5.3 (i.e, the %{fedora} macro is not defined on that distribution), whereas it gives "11" under Fedora Rawhide and "10" under Fedora 10 (as expected). However, I'm not sure that the following assertion "0%{fedora} >= 10" holds false under CentOS 5.3. Also, still on CentOS 5.3, the three %{rhel}, %{rhl} and %{el5} macros are undefined, though they should be defined, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag . Or, did I miss something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review