Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #19 from D Haley <my...@yahoo.com> 2009-06-02 06:21:29 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/stxxl-8.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/stxxl-1.2.1-8.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint: $ rpmlint stxxl.spec ../SRPMS/stxxl-1.2.1-8.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/stxxl-1.2.1-8.fc10.i386.rpm ..//RPMS/i386/stxxl-devel-1.2.1-8.fc10.i386.rpm ../RPMS/i386/stxxl-doc-1.2.1-8.fc10.i386.rpm ../RPMS/i386/stxxl-debuginfo-1.2.1-8.fc10.i386.rpm 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji: F9:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1389134 F10:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1389156 F11:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1389127 I removed the noarch entirely, as my rpm does not support this directive per sub-package, but rather attempts to provide it across all packages. This causes rpmlint to be annoyed about libs in a noarch package. The wiki says that this feature is coming *soon* but is not here yet, but maybe both it and I are out of date?: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NoarchSubpackages So here is my revision. The only difference from -7 is the removal of the noarch directive. With regards to the build system, at this time it is more work to make it autoconf friendly than to just keep the current "system" chugging along. Maybe next release :-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
