Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481333


Martin Dengler <mar...@martindengler.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mar...@martindengler.com




--- Comment #22 from Martin Dengler <mar...@martindengler.com>  2009-06-09 
20:50:38 EDT ---
The rpm is broken as it is currently in rawhide (code fails to import
bitfrost).  The specfile doesn't look correct to me.  It shouldn't be deleting
part of the code it's meant to install.  This patch fixes it for me:

---
 sugar-update-control.spec |    2 --
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sugar-update-control.spec b/sugar-update-control.spec
index d5e16aa..09eda58 100644
--- a/sugar-update-control.spec
+++ b/sugar-update-control.spec
@@ -33,8 +33,6 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 %{__python} setup.py install --root=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT

-# avoid conflicts with standard __init__.py*
-rm
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/{bitfrost,bitfrost/update,bitfrost/util}/__init__.py*
 %find_lang %{name}

 %clean
--                                                                              
1.6.0.6                                                                         
~

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to