Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) <panem...@gmail.com> 2009-06-25 06:05:37 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1432964 + source files match upstream url 0a4f50b690ae946c3188614eeea6f1e5f02681d9 SQLAlchemy-0.5.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application I don't get why all .py* files installed under /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/SQLAlchemy-0.5.3-py2.6.egg ? Why rpmlint is complaining script-without-shebang error with this package whereas I don't see such rpmlint messages in rawhide package? why following is added to SPEC ? BuildRequires: python-sqlite2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
