Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509990 --- Comment #8 from Jan F. Chadima <jchad...@redhat.com> 2009-07-08 02:46:51 EDT --- > > I do see some of the files seem to come from Debian openssh-blacklist packages > (have identical creation dates). Why not getting remaining key sizes included > in openssh-blacklist upstream tarball and name Fedora package after it? because the next package with full keys will follow instead of debian. > Also, is there any good reason why le32_rsa_8192 contains only 5083 > fingerprints, rather than full space of ~2^15 keys? It's obviously derived > from the HDMoore's *incomplete* set of 8192 bit LE32 keys [1], which, if I > remember correctly, was published as incomplete due to time constraints at the > time of publication. > > [1] http://www.metasploit.com/users/hdm/tools/debian-openssl/ generating 8192 keys is extremly slow both 8192 keys are incomplete, the le64 I finish before release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
