Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu> 2009-07-11 04:01:57 EDT --- It seems that FESCo took up this issue, although it looks like there were talking about something different. See http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-07-10/fedora-meeting.2009-07-10-17.00.html (Adobe CMap files - code or content?) and https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/177. That seems to answer one question (the legal one) but begs another: is this package duplicating something that's already in ghostscript? Can the data be unified and shared between the two packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
