Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 --- Comment #15 from Matt Domsch <matt_dom...@dell.com> 2009-07-13 08:39:23 EDT --- The DMTF didn't write the RPM .spec file originally, Novell OpenSUSE did. If this is a case of the spec file needing to be licensed differently than the content it refers to, getting Novell to explicitly note a license on the spec file itself should be easy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
