Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454329 --- Comment #15 from Rahul Sundaram <sunda...@redhat.com> 2009-07-18 15:00:58 EDT --- The idea of looking into six month old reviews of only mine because of your desire to improve quality does not sound very convincing. You might not know this but Daniel Drake works for OLPC. If there are any performance issues with the choice of a file based dependency, he would fixed it by now. There are no need force a common sense recommendation in the guidelines into a mandatory check point and file based dependencies are NOT forbidden at all. All the guidelines have been followed and the review quality is fine. If you disagree and want to dig up old reviews, go ahead and take it up to FESCo. Until that point, I have nothing further to say on this topic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
